Amazon False Advertising

Amazon Faces $500 Million Lawsuit Over Alleged False Advertising of Recycled Printer Cartridges

Last Updated: September 11, 2023By

Chatsworth, California, 9-11-23 – In a legal showdown that could have far-reaching implications for the e-commerce giant Amazon, Planet Green Cartridges, Inc., a U.S. printer cartridge recycling and remanufacturing company, has initiated a $500 million lawsuit. The crux of this legal battle revolves around Amazon’s alleged complicity in false advertising and unfair competition tied to the sale of newly manufactured non-OEM clone printer ink cartridges, misleadingly labeled as “remanufactured” and falsely touted as eco-friendly recycled products.

Under the case number 2:23-cv-06647, this lawsuit, known as Planet Green v. Amazon, raises serious concerns about the proliferation of these non-OEM clone printer cartridges deceptively marketed as remanufactured items. These products have flooded the market through Amazon’s extensive online platforms, including Amazon.com and Amazon Warehouse. They often originate from Chinese manufacturers, bearing misleading labels and recycling symbols, which convey erroneous environmental claims that directly contradict Amazon’s publicized environmental mission, as well as flout federal and state laws.

Deceptive Marketing Practices Persist

Despite repeated entreaties from Planet Green to address the issue, Amazon continues to sell, distribute, and facilitate the sale of these controversial cartridges. These practices systematically target and mislead countless Amazon customers through deceptive advertising techniques and false advertising.

One alarming aspect of this situation is the lack of return recycling programs for imported clone printer cartridges, leaving consumers with limited options for responsible plastic waste management. According to Energy Central, the annual disposal of over 375 million printer cartridges in U.S. landfills poses a grave environmental concern. Furthermore, the production of these new clone cartridges exacerbates the depletion of natural resources and the escalation of greenhouse gas emissions, further damaging the environment.

The Erosion of a Once-Flourishing Industry

The U.S. printer cartridge remanufacturing industry, once hailed as an innovative solution to tackle printer cartridge waste, thrived in the 1980s. In its heyday, this sector significantly bolstered the U.S. economy, fostering numerous businesses and generating jobs within a circular economy valued in the billions. Regrettably, the industry now confronts an existential threat, primarily attributed to the influx of imported single-use clone printer cartridges readily available on Amazon’s platforms.

Sean Levi, CEO of Planet Green, commented on the situation, saying, “Given Amazon’s proclaimed commitment to sustainability and Jeff Bezos’ Earth Fund, it is reasonable to expect Amazon to be actively engaged in finding a solution, rather than perpetuating a substantial environmental challenge. I call upon Jeff Bezos to lead the way and help revive the printer cartridge remanufacturing industry, which remains the only viable solution for reducing the environmental impact of printer cartridge plastic waste.

Amazon Ink Cartridge Waste - False Advertising

A Unified Effort for Change

This lawsuit has been officially filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, marking a pivotal milestone in Planet Green’s broader efforts to combat plastic waste, safeguard the environment, fight false advertising from Amazon and to reinvigorate a circular economy. To learn more about this cause and join these initiatives, visit Accountability Together We Can Make a Difference.

Planet Green Cartridges’ lawsuit against Amazon underscores the pressing need for transparency in advertising, especially in matters pertaining to environmental claims. By pursuing legal action against deceptive practices, Planet Green aims to protect the environment, support a beleaguered industry, and encourage ethical business conduct in the realm of e-commerce. The outcome of this lawsuit will undoubtedly have significant ramifications for both the recycling industry and consumers’ ability to make informed, eco-conscious choices.